Respect rules, competitive sports can be more exciting | Beijing News Quick review

2022-06-12 0 By

The refereeing and penalty problems caused by the Winter Olympic Games are mainly caused by the characteristics of the Olympic Games themselves.| founder yu in the Beijing Olympics, not only the players performing, on the judges of law enforcement is also feels dye-in-the-wood.Especially in short track speed skating and other events, the judges often decide the quota of promotion and even the champion.For those unfamiliar with winter Olympic sports, the question may be: Is it normal to have so much discussion about penalties?In fact, this is one of the peculiarities of winter Olympic sports, which often require more human refereeing to ensure fair play.For example, in track and field sprints, where each competitor is assigned a track, there are fewer collisions and fewer referees to intervene.However, in the short track speed skating event with an average speed of 45 km/h, there is no lane separation, and multiple skaters must be very close to each other to grab a good position, and various body collisions are inevitable.How to establish blame for these collisions is for the referees to decide.Short track speed skating has had its fair share of surprises and controversies since its entry into the Winter Olympics in 1992.Including in the men’s 1,000-meter short-track speedskating event at the 2002 Salt Lake City Games, Australia’s Brad Bradbury won gold in unlikely fashion after being disqualified for a foul in the heats and then having all his opponents fall in the final.Today, Bradbury is used to being called “the luckiest winter Olympic champion in history,” but there is nothing inherently wrong with decisions and accidents, which are a normal part of sporting events.Coach Su pleaded for an end to criticizing referees.Perhaps the contestants know this better than the audience.Su Yiming, 17, won a silver medal in the men’s snowboard slopestyle final.After the game, many audience for his injustice, that a gold medal player’s mistake escaped the referee’s deduction points.Despite such different voices, Su yiming and her coaching team were very calm. They not only congratulated the gold medalists generously, but also thanked the judges on the spot, understanding the difficulties they faced in scoring.So how can such difficulties be minimized?The introduction of more high-tech means has become one of the important reform measures.Winter Olympic sports such as short-track speed skating have a longer history and are in the process of upgrading their use of video playback than tennis, which introduced hawk-eye, or soccer, which uses VAR.At the 2018 Winter Olympics in Pyeongchang, for example, judges used an independent camera system to review athletes’ movements.The system may not be at the same Angle as the footage provided by broadcasters, meaning judges and viewers will see different images.It is this difference in viewing Angle that sometimes leads to unconvincing decisions.In short-track speed skating in Beijing, new systems and technical staff have been put in place to ensure judges use the same Angle of video as broadcasters and make decisions more accessible to viewers who see the same footage in real time.As a result, there have been far fewer questions about the integrity of the games during the Games, despite numerous instances of penalty decisions, thanks in large part to reforms aimed at promoting transparency.

Video processing does not affect the normal release of the article

Replace the cover

Li Wenlong, the first coach to read the interpretation contest.For example, in the men’s 5,000m short-track speed skating relay semifinal, The Chinese team finished fourth in the group despite li Wenlong’s unexpected crash, but was judged to be the top two in the group after the race.The reason for the back-and-forth was that after watching the video replay, the judges confirmed that Lee’s fall was a “kicking knife” that was not the fault of either player.Through no fault of their own, China could still advance if it meets three rules: first, it happens after the halfway point of the tournament;Second, to be in a position that would have been possible at the time of the “kicking knife”;Third, there were no other violations.Just because the Chinese team fully met these conditions, they were able to win back the qualification after the referee intervened.Therefore, as long as it is based on a thorough understanding of the rules and careful viewing of replays, it is accepted that this is a fairer result and a decision worthy of respect by all.Generally speaking, the problems of judgment and punishment in the Winter Olympics are mainly caused by the characteristics of the Winter Olympics. If you know the relevant rules, you will not make a fuss about it.For the players, respecting the judgment is the foundation of the long-term project.For the audience, only by respecting the penalty can they fully appreciate the charm of sports.Special correspondent yu (media) to edit | | founder rossie Xiao proofing | liujun